Goode v Minister for Community Services [2004] NSWADT 107
The Tribunal found that the applicants had the custody of the children as a result of a constructive decision by the Minister's delegate to place the children with them pursuant to s 91(1)(d)(ii), and thus, the decision to terminate their custody was made under s 91(1)(e) and is reviewable by the Tribunal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 June 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Review of Administrative Decision / Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
- Outcome
- Tribunal has jurisdiction to determine the application for review
- Legal Topics
- ['jurisdiction of Tribunal' 'reviewable Decisions' 'custody Termination' 'placement Authority Under Child Protection Statutes']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Review of Administrative Decision / Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to review the decision to remove foster children from applicants' custody" 'Whether the decision to remove children was made under s 91(1)(e) of the Children (Care and Protection) Act 1987']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the applicants had the custody of the children as a result of a constructive decision by the Minister's delegate to place the children with them pursuant to s 91(1)(d)(ii), and thus, the decision to terminate their custody was made under s 91(1)(e) and is reviewable by the Tribunal.
Court Disposition
Tribunal has jurisdiction to determine the application for review
Orders
- ['The Tribunal has jurisdiction to determine the application for review.' 'Within 14 days of the date of these reasons the Respondent is to lodge with the Tribunal any or all documents as required by s 58(1)(b) of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997.' 'The matter to be set down for further directions on...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment