Ramirez v Ramirez [2009] FCA 1033

Ramirez v Ramirez [2009] FCA 1033

The applicant failed to provide special reasons or any prima facie case for appeal; the claims made were vague and unsupported. Therefore, the application for extension of time to appeal is dismissed with costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 September 2009
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve Notice of Appeal
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'bankruptcy Proceedings' 'special Reasons' 'pro Bono Representation']
['bankruptcy' 'civil Procedure'] ['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'bankruptcy Proceedings' 'special Reasons' 'pro Bono Representation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve Notice of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether there are 'special reasons' to grant extension of time to appeal" 'Whether applicant has a prima facie case for appeal against sequestration order' 'Adequacy of explanation for delay in filing appeal']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide special reasons or any prima facie case for appeal; the claims made were vague and unsupported. Therefore, the application for extension of time to appeal is dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • ['The Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve a Notice of Appeal be dismissed.' 'The Applicant pay the costs of the Respondent.']