R v Wegener [1999] NSWCCA 405
The sentence imposed by Judge Flannery did not comply with the requirements of section 5(1) of the Periodic Detention Of Prisoners Act as amended, as no fixed term or minimum/ additional term of imprisonment was specified before considering periodic detention. As such, the sentence was set aside and the matter remitted for re-sentencing in accordance with the amended Act.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Regina; Applicant: Heinz George Wegener
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence; Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; leave to appeal against sentence granted
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Periodic Detention, Periodic Detention of Prisoners Amendment Act No 43 of 1998
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecutor
Heinz George Wegener
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence; Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in failing to observe the two-stage sentencing process required by the amended Periodic Detention Of Prisoners Act
- 2 Whether sentence could be served by periodic detention without first fixing a term of imprisonment per legislative amendment
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed by Judge Flannery did not comply with the requirements of section 5(1) of the Periodic Detention Of Prisoners Act as amended, as no fixed term or minimum/ additional term of imprisonment was specified before considering periodic detention. As such, the sentence was set aside and the matter remitted for re-sentencing in accordance with the amended Act.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; leave to appeal against sentence granted
Orders
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted
- Appeal allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment