Regina v Thompson [2003] NSWCCA 219
The sentencing judge took the relevant subjective matters into account, made no error in the approach to the Form 1 offences, and the overall sentence was not manifestly excessive given the serious and protracted course of dishonesty, substantial irrecoverable loss to the employer, breach of trust, objective gravity of the offences and need for denunciation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 August 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence / Appeal From District Court Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['making a False Instrument' 'using a False Instrument' 'form 1 Offences' 'guilty Plea Discount' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence' 'delay' 'rehabilitation' 'breach of Trust']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence / Appeal From District Court Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in considering the particular facts when fixing the sentences' 'Whether the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive' 'Whether the sentencing judge properly approached the offences taken into account under the Form 1 procedure']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge took the relevant subjective matters into account, made no error in the approach to the Form 1 offences, and the overall sentence was not manifestly excessive given the serious and protracted course of dishonesty, substantial irrecoverable loss to the employer, breach of trust, objective gravity of the offences and need for denunciation.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment