Galloway v Hasn [2009] NSWDC 349
There was no negligence on the part of the defendant in performing the right total hip replacement. The surgery was clinically indicated, appropriate conservative treatments had failed, proper pre-operative and intra-operative procedures were undertaken, and the resulting leg length discrepancy was within an acceptable range according to peer professional opinion.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Helen Galloway; Defendant: Dr B James Hasn
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 August 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Verdict for the defendant
- Legal Topics
- Hip Replacement Surgery, Leg Length Discrepancy, Professional Negligence, Pre and Intra Operative Procedures, Causation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Helen Galloway
Plaintiff
Dr B James Hasn
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether right hip replacement surgery was performed negligently resulting in increased leg length discrepancy
- 2 Appropriateness of pre and intra-operative procedures
- 3 Causation of plaintiff's pain and discomfort
Ratio Decidendi
There was no negligence on the part of the defendant in performing the right total hip replacement. The surgery was clinically indicated, appropriate conservative treatments had failed, proper pre-operative and intra-operative procedures were undertaken, and the resulting leg length discrepancy was within an acceptable range according to peer professional opinion.
Court Disposition
Verdict for the defendant
Orders
- Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs on an ordinary basis up to and including 15 October 2007 and on an indemnity basis thereafter
- The exhibits are returned
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment