Haskakis v Hatzopoulos [2015] NSWSC 1408
Taking into account Helen's financial position, medical condition, and needs, and notwithstanding her strained relationship and harmful conduct toward her mother, the provision made in the will was not adequate for her proper maintenance and advancement in life. However, the amplitude of provision should be moderated due to her conduct and relationship. An order for provision is appropriate, but not in the amount sought; a legacy of $416,000 is adequate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Family Provision Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Order for further provision
- Legal Topics
- ['family Provision' 'disentitling Conduct' "testator's Moral Obligation" 'provision for Adult Child' 'proper Maintenance and Advancement' 'estranged Relationships']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the provision for Helen Haskakis in the deceased's will was adequate for her proper maintenance and advancement in life" 'Whether Helen engaged in disentitling conduct' 'Impact of strained relationship between Helen and her mother on her claim' "Consideration of Helen's financial needs and disabilities"]
Ratio Decidendi
Taking into account Helen's financial position, medical condition, and needs, and notwithstanding her strained relationship and harmful conduct toward her mother, the provision made in the will was not adequate for her proper maintenance and advancement in life. However, the amplitude of provision should be moderated due to her conduct and relationship. An order for provision is appropriate, but not in the amount sought; a legacy of $416,000 is adequate.
Court Disposition
Order for further provision
Orders
- ['Provision be made for Helen Haskakis by way of pecuniary legacy of $416,000 out of the estate of Mrs Caralis' 'The burden of $236,000 of the legacy to be borne by residuary beneficiaries in proportion; $180,000 to be borne equally by Bill and James Caralis' 'If legacy is not paid within 30 days, interest payable...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment