Prior v Brown [2011] NSWSC 1006
The Plaintiff made modest financial and significant non-financial contributions during a relationship of under 5 years; a just and equitable adjustment requires a lump sum payment of $180,000 by the Defendant to the Plaintiff, with the option for the Plaintiff to purchase the Defendant's interest in the Radcliffe Place property or, failing that, for the property to be sold and proceeds divided equally. The property pool is valued as at the date of hearing, and contributions assessed holistically rather than mathematically.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Property Adjustment Under Property (relationships) Act 1984 (nsw) / Principal Judgment; Reasons Provided; Orders to Be Made at Later Date
- Outcome
- Plaintiff established entitlement to adjusting order; modest adjustment in her favour; orders to be made at later date, proceedings stood over.
- Legal Topics
- ['property Adjustment' 'de Facto Relationships' 'contributions' 'valuation Date' 'division of Assets']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Property Adjustment Under Property (relationships) Act 1984 (nsw) / Principal Judgment; Reasons Provided; Orders to Be Made at Later Date
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Adjustment of property interests under Property (Relationships) Act 1984' 'Determination of the commencement and end dates of the de facto relationship' 'Nature, value, and contributions to property owned' 'Time at which value of property is to be calculated' 'Direct and indirect contributions made by each party']
Ratio Decidendi
The Plaintiff made modest financial and significant non-financial contributions during a relationship of under 5 years; a just and equitable adjustment requires a lump sum payment of $180,000 by the Defendant to the Plaintiff, with the option for the Plaintiff to purchase the Defendant's interest in the Radcliffe Place property or, failing that, for the property to be sold and proceeds divided equally. The property pool is valued as at the date of hearing, and contributions assessed holistically rather than mathematically.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff established entitlement to adjusting order; modest adjustment in her favour; orders to be made at later date, proceedings stood over.
Orders
- ['Plaintiff to receive lump sum payment of $180,000 from Defendant.' "Plaintiff may use the lump sum to purchase Defendant's interest in Radcliffe Place property ($103,500)." 'If Plaintiff does not purchase, Radcliffe Place property to be sold and net proceeds divided equally.' 'Plaintiff to retain furniture and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment