Adams v Warringah Council [2011] NSWLEC 1063
The proposed conversion of the outbuilding to a second dwelling was refused because it was inconsistent with the desired future character of the B2 Oxford Falls Valley locality and the planning intent reflected in the one dwelling per 20 ha housing density standard. Although the physical buildings already existed and the draft LEP was given little weight, the second dwelling would require further site works including parking and hardstand areas, would not enhance the natural landscape, and no exceptional circumstances justified the substantial variation from the density control. The remaining works to the existing dwelling, carport, garden shed, water tanks, underground electricity and...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S97(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Refusal of Development Application No Da2009/1331 / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- The appeal was upheld in part. Development Application No DA2009/1331 was approved only for specified works to the existing dwelling and associated works, and refused insofar as it proposed conversion of the existing outbuilding to a dwelling house.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 'desired Future Character' 'housing Density Standards' 'draft Local Environmental Plan' 'access and Parking' 'bushfire Prone Land']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S97(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Refusal of Development Application No Da2009/1331 / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed conversion of an existing outbuilding to a dwelling house was consistent with the desired future character for the Oxford Falls Valley locality.' 'Whether the development should be allowed having regard to the housing density standard of one dwelling per 20 ha and whether it would overdevelop the site.' 'Whether the proposed access and parking arrangements were satisfactory.' 'What weight should be given to the draft local environmental plan and strategic planning intent for the site and locality.']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed conversion of the outbuilding to a second dwelling was refused because it was inconsistent with the desired future character of the B2 Oxford Falls Valley locality and the planning intent reflected in the one dwelling per 20 ha housing density standard. Although the physical buildings already existed and the draft LEP was given little weight, the second dwelling would require further site works including parking and hardstand areas, would not enhance the natural landscape, and no exceptional circumstances justified the substantial variation from the density control. The remaining works to the existing dwelling, carport, garden shed, water tanks, underground electricity and...
Court Disposition
The appeal was upheld in part. Development Application No DA2009/1331 was approved only for specified works to the existing dwelling and associated works, and refused insofar as it proposed conversion of the existing outbuilding to a dwelling house.
Orders
- ['The appeal, in respect of lot 2 DP 27916, No. 66 Northcott Road, Cromer is upheld in part.' 'Development Application No DA2009/1331 is approved for alterations and additions to an existing dwelling house including an attached carport, 5000 litre water tank and works to bring the building to accord with the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment