Tjungarrayi v Western Australia [2019] HCA 12
Mineral exploration licences granted under the Mining Act 1978 (WA) and petroleum exploration permits granted under the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967 (WA) are not 'leases' within the meaning of s 47B(1)(b)(i) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth). Section 242(2) extends the meaning of 'lease' only in the context of references to a 'mining lease', not to a general reference to 'lease' such as appears in s 47B(1)(b)(i). Therefore, the prior extinguishment of native title by reason of a mineral exploration licence or petroleum exploration permit must be disregarded under s 47B, and the claimants' rights are not extinguished merely because of the existence of these interests.
- Parties
- Appellant: Helicopter Tjungarrayi & Ors; Appellant: KN (deceased) and Others (Tjiwarl and Tjiwarl #2); Respondent: State of Western Australia & Ors; Respondent: Third respondent in P37/2018 and third to tenth, twelfth, thirteenth and sixteenth respondents in P38/2018; Respondent: Second respondent in P37/2018 and the second, eleventh, fourteenth and fifteenth respondents in P38/2018
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / High Court of Australia Judgment on Appeal From the Federal Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed for both matters
- Legal Topics
- Extinguishment of Native Title, Interpretation of 'lease' Under Native Title Act, Mining Tenements and Native Title, Statutory Construction, Non Extinguishment Principle
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Helicopter Tjungarrayi & Ors
Appellant
KN (deceased) and Others (Tjiwarl and Tjiwarl #2)
Appellant
State of Western Australia & Ors
Respondent
Third respondent in P37/2018 and third to tenth, twelfth, thirteenth and sixteenth respondents in P38/2018
Respondent
Second respondent in P37/2018 and the second, eleventh, fourteenth and fifteenth respondents in P38/2018
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court of Australia Judgment on Appeal From the Federal Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether mineral exploration licences or petroleum exploration permits are 'leases' within the meaning of s 47B(1)(b)(i) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
- 2 Proper construction of s 242(2) of the Native Title Act regarding inclusion of licences or authorities as leases for the purposes of Native Title Act
Ratio Decidendi
Mineral exploration licences granted under the Mining Act 1978 (WA) and petroleum exploration permits granted under the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967 (WA) are not 'leases' within the meaning of s 47B(1)(b)(i) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth). Section 242(2) extends the meaning of 'lease' only in the context of references to a 'mining lease', not to a general reference to 'lease' such as appears in s 47B(1)(b)(i). Therefore, the prior extinguishment of native title by reason of a mineral exploration licence or petroleum exploration permit must be disregarded under s 47B, and the claimants' rights are not extinguished merely because of the existence of these interests.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed for both matters
Orders
- In Matter No P37/2018: Appeal allowed.
- Set aside the orders of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia made on 16 March 2018 in proceeding WAD 444 of 2017 and, in their place, order that the appeal to the Full Court be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment