Han v R [2012] NSWCCA 257
The applicant failed to establish a good and substantial reason to withdraw his guilty pleas; there were no meaningful differences between original and revised statements of facts; correspondence and conduct indicated understanding of the charges; no evidence of inducement or misunderstanding by the applicant; no miscarriage of justice occurred; no manifest excess or error was identified in the sentence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence Following Plea of Guilty
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction dismissed; leave to appeal against sentence refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Conviction' 'appeal Against Sentence' 'plea of Guilty' 'conspiracy' 'false Instruments' 'telecommunications Offences' 'miscarriage of Justice']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence Following Plea of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether circumstances in which applicant entered guilty plea caused a miscarriage of justice' 'Whether plea was based on erroneous agreed facts or misunderstanding as to agreed sentence' 'Whether applicant understood the true nature of the charges' 'Whether sentence was excessive or in error']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to establish a good and substantial reason to withdraw his guilty pleas; there were no meaningful differences between original and revised statements of facts; correspondence and conduct indicated understanding of the charges; no evidence of inducement or misunderstanding by the applicant; no miscarriage of justice occurred; no manifest excess or error was identified in the sentence.
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction dismissed; leave to appeal against sentence refused.
Orders
- ['Appeal against conviction dismissed' 'Leave to appeal against sentence refused']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment