Radic v Henley Properties (NSW) Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1292

Radic v Henley Properties (NSW) Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1292

The test for apprehended bias was not satisfied; the judge’s preliminary views and robust exchanges did not establish a reasonable apprehension of bias, and the parties were given a genuine opportunity to address the judge’s concerns.

Parties
First Applicant: Sinisa Radic; Second Applicant: Borka Radic; Respondent: Henley Properties (NSW) Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 September 2000
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Disqualification Based on Apprehended Bias
Outcome
Application for disqualification dismissed
Legal Topics
Disqualification of Judge, Apprehended Bias, Transfer of Proceedings
Courts and Judges Trade Practices Disqualification of Judge Apprehended Bias Transfer of Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sinisa Radic

First Applicant

Borka Radic

Second Applicant

Henley Properties (NSW) Pty Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory Application for Disqualification Based on Apprehended Bias

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the expression of preliminary views on transfer of proceedings constitutes grounds for disqualification based on apprehended bias

Ratio Decidendi

The test for apprehended bias was not satisfied; the judge’s preliminary views and robust exchanges did not establish a reasonable apprehension of bias, and the parties were given a genuine opportunity to address the judge’s concerns.

Court Disposition

Application for disqualification dismissed

Orders

  • Paragraph 4 of the motion filed in court on 1 September 2000 be dismissed.