Dimer on behalf of the Marlinyu Ghoorlie Claim Group v State of Western Australia (No 3) [2023] FCA 1073
The interests of justice, including timely determination and efficient use of judicial resources, strongly favour refusing the application to vary the trial timetable, as the prejudice to efficient administration from delay outweighs speculative prejudice to the applicant from lack of expert evidence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Native Title Determination Application / Interlocutory Application to Vacate/vary Trial Timetable
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['trial Management' 'timetabling Orders' 'funding for Expert Evidence' 'joinder of Parties' 'interlocutory Applications']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Native Title Determination Application / Interlocutory Application to Vacate/vary Trial Timetable
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the trial timetable should be varied to allow a respondent to prepare and file expert anthropological evidence' 'Whether prejudice to efficient administration of justice outweighs prejudice to respondent lacking expert evidence']
Ratio Decidendi
The interests of justice, including timely determination and efficient use of judicial resources, strongly favour refusing the application to vary the trial timetable, as the prejudice to efficient administration from delay outweighs speculative prejudice to the applicant from lack of expert evidence.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The interlocutory application filed by Elizabeth Sambo on 4 September 2023 be dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment