Hera Resources Pty Ltd v Gekko Systems Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 37
The OMC Report was not prepared for the dominant purpose of obtaining legal advice or legal proceedings, and privilege was waived by providing it to Hera. The 26 October 2016 letter and the OMC Report were not sufficiently connected to an attempt to negotiate a settlement, and thus do not attract privilege under s 131. Both documents are admissible at trial.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Motion / Advance Ruling on Admissibility at Trial
- Outcome
- Ruling for plaintiff; both documents admissible; costs awarded
- Legal Topics
- ['client Legal Privilege' 'without Prejudice Privilege' 'admissibility of Documents' 'settlement Negotiations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Motion / Advance Ruling on Admissibility at Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the 26 October 2016 letter and the OMC Report are privileged under client legal privilege or without prejudice privilege and thereby inadmissible']
Ratio Decidendi
The OMC Report was not prepared for the dominant purpose of obtaining legal advice or legal proceedings, and privilege was waived by providing it to Hera. The 26 October 2016 letter and the OMC Report were not sufficiently connected to an attempt to negotiate a settlement, and thus do not attract privilege under s 131. Both documents are admissible at trial.
Court Disposition
Ruling for plaintiff; both documents admissible; costs awarded
Orders
- ['Pursuant to s 192A of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), the Court rules that the admissibility in evidence at the trial of these proceedings of the letter from the defendant to the plaintiff dated 26 October 2016 and the report by Brian Putland of Orway Mineral Consultants (WA) Pty Ltd dated 25 October 2016 is not...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment