Kurniadi v Loh (No 2) [2005] FCA 976
Given that the applicants are non-residents without assets in Australia, and for reasons set out regarding the progress and efficiency of the proceedings, security for costs is warranted in the sum of $10,000 for each applicant. Programming directions requiring statements of contentions are appropriate, but substantive progression should await the lead matters.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Motion for Security for Costs and Programming Orders / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Limited security for costs ordered; programming directions given; stay of proceedings against respondent if security not provided by deadline.
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'practice and Procedure' 'trade Practices Act S 51 Ac' 'unconscionable Conduct' 'misleading or Deceptive Conduct']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Motion for Security for Costs and Programming Orders / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether security for costs should be ordered against non-resident, non-citizen applicants without assets in Australia' 'Whether programming directions should be given for unrepresented applicants in parallel with represented lead cases']
Ratio Decidendi
Given that the applicants are non-residents without assets in Australia, and for reasons set out regarding the progress and efficiency of the proceedings, security for costs is warranted in the sum of $10,000 for each applicant. Programming directions requiring statements of contentions are appropriate, but substantive progression should await the lead matters.
Court Disposition
Limited security for costs ordered; programming directions given; stay of proceedings against respondent if security not provided by deadline.
Orders
- ['Applicants in WAD 8 and WAD 18 required to provide $10,000 security for costs to the second respondent by 15 August 2005, by bank guarantee or payment to Registrar.' 'If not paid by 15 August 2005, application stayed against the relevant respondent.' 'Costs of the motion for security reserved.' 'Pleadings...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment