Herscu v The Queen [1991] HCA 40
A Minister’s attempt to influence a council, even absent a specific legal power or obligation to do so, constitutes the discharge of the duties of office for the purposes of s. 87(2) of The Criminal Code (Qld), as such duties encompass the general functions, influence, and responsibilities of the office. Thus, the statutory offence of official corruption is made out where the corrupt benefit is provided on account of such an act.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Appeal in the High Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['official Corruption' 'public Office Duties' 'statutory Construction' 'bribery']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appeal in the High Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether an attempt by a Minister to secure approval by a local council to changes in planning conditions can, as a matter of law, be regarded as an act done 'in the discharge of the duties of his office' for the purpose of s. 87(2) of The Criminal Code (Qld)"]
Ratio Decidendi
A Minister’s attempt to influence a council, even absent a specific legal power or obligation to do so, constitutes the discharge of the duties of office for the purposes of s. 87(2) of The Criminal Code (Qld), as such duties encompass the general functions, influence, and responsibilities of the office. Thus, the statutory offence of official corruption is made out where the corrupt benefit is provided on account of such an act.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment