R v Saleh [2023] NSWDC 645
Given the appellant's low risk of reoffending, contrition, remorse, and the limited actual bodily harm suffered, it is appropriate to set aside the Local Court sentence and instead impose an aggregate sentence of 22 months to be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order with home detention for 14 months and 150 hours of community service.
- Parties
- Respondent: Crown (NSW); Appellant: Hessein Saleh
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 September 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence varied
- Legal Topics
- Common Assault, Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm, Sentencing, Intensive Correction Order, Home Detention, Aggregate Sentence, COVID 19 Pandemic
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Crown (NSW)
Respondent
Hessein Saleh
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether an Intensive Correction Order with home detention is appropriate for offences of common assault and assault occasioning actual bodily harm
Ratio Decidendi
Given the appellant's low risk of reoffending, contrition, remorse, and the limited actual bodily harm suffered, it is appropriate to set aside the Local Court sentence and instead impose an aggregate sentence of 22 months to be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order with home detention for 14 months and 150 hours of community service.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence varied
Orders
- Set aside Local Court sentence imposed on 12 May 2023
- Appellant sentenced to aggregate term of one year and ten months' imprisonment, to be served by way of Intensive Correction Order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment