SafeWork NSW v Hiltour Pty Ltd [2018] NSWDC 376
Hiltour Pty Ltd failed to comply with its health and safety duties under s19(1) Work Health and Safety Act 2011 by not training its employee, resulting in substantial injury, and failed to notify SafeWork NSW as required. The seriousness of the injury, lack of training, and procedural failures warranted conviction and fines, mitigated by the guilty plea, remorse, rehabilitation prospects, and cooperation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Conviction and fines imposed for both offences.
- Legal Topics
- ['prosecution' 'duty of Persons Undertaking Business' 'duty of Employers' 'risk of Serious Injury' 'worker Injured' 'safety Incident Reporting' 'sentencing' 'aggravating Factors' 'mitigating Factors' 'objective Seriousness' 'deterrence' 'substantial Harm' 'no Record of Previous Convictions' 'rehabilitation' 'plea of Guilty' 'assistance to Law Enforcement Authorities' 'remorse' 'lack of Employee Training' 'no Documented Safe Work Procedure' 'risk Control Measures' 'prosecution Costs' 'batching Chemical Compounds' 'chemical Induced Allergic Reaction' 'failure to Report Incident']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Failure to comply with health and safety duty resulting in exposure to risk of death or serious injury contrary to s32 Work Health and Safety Act 2011' 'Failure to notify SafeWork NSW of incident contrary to s38 Work Health and Safety Act 2011' 'Sentencing considerations for work health and safety offences']
Ratio Decidendi
Hiltour Pty Ltd failed to comply with its health and safety duties under s19(1) Work Health and Safety Act 2011 by not training its employee, resulting in substantial injury, and failed to notify SafeWork NSW as required. The seriousness of the injury, lack of training, and procedural failures warranted conviction and fines, mitigated by the guilty plea, remorse, rehabilitation prospects, and cooperation.
Court Disposition
Conviction and fines imposed for both offences.
Orders
- ['Conviction of both offences.' 'Fine of $45,000 for section 32 offence.' 'Fine of $3,750 for section 38 offence.' 'Pursuant to section 122(2) Fines Act 1996, 50% of fine is to be paid to the prosecutor.' "Offender to pay prosecutor's costs in the sum of $38,000."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment