So v Blacktown City Council [2023] NSWLEC 1020

So v Blacktown City Council [2023] NSWLEC 1020

The development application was refused because the proposed childcare centre, as designed, would result in unacceptable increases in flood levels on adjoining properties and surrounding streets (up to 0.11 m above pre-development levels), failing to satisfy the relevant planning controls for flood impact mitigation. The site was not demonstrated to be suitable for the proposed use due to residual flood risk not adequately addressed by the proposed design or conditions. Accordingly, the legislative requirements under s 4.15(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and associated development control instruments were not met.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 January 2023
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application / Final Judgment and Orders After Hearing
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; development application refused
Legal Topics
['development Applications' 'childcare Centres' 'flooding and Stormwater Management' 'site Suitability' 'environmental Planning Instruments']
['planning Law' 'environmental Law' 'local Government Law'] ['development Applications' 'childcare Centres' 'flooding and Stormwater Management' 'site Suitability' 'environmental Planning Instruments']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application / Final Judgment and Orders After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the proposed childcare centre is suitable on the site in view of flood risk and planning controls' 'Whether the amended development application satisfies relevant statutory and planning requirements, including management of flooding impacts' 'Whether the design of the development sufficiently mitigates flood impacts on adjoining properties and the surrounding area']

Ratio Decidendi

The development application was refused because the proposed childcare centre, as designed, would result in unacceptable increases in flood levels on adjoining properties and surrounding streets (up to 0.11 m above pre-development levels), failing to satisfy the relevant planning controls for flood impact mitigation. The site was not demonstrated to be suitable for the proposed use due to residual flood risk not adequately addressed by the proposed design or conditions. Accordingly, the legislative requirements under s 4.15(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and associated development control instruments were not met.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; development application refused

Orders

  • ['Leave is granted to the Applicant to rely upon amended plans and documents filed in the appeal.' 'The appeal is dismissed.' 'Development Application DA-20-01096 as amended is refused for the proposed two-storey childcare centre with parking and associated works at 2 Galbraith Street, Nirimbia Fields.' 'All...