R v Brookman [2021] NSWDC 110
Tendency evidence regarding sexual interest in the complainant and young males, with explicit exclusions made for prejudicial aspects, is admissible under ss 97, 97A, and 101 of the Evidence Act as it has significant probative value not outweighed by unfair prejudice; complaint evidence admitted as being fresh in memory; evidence of child prostitution at relevant times is admissible under s 293(4)(b) Criminal Procedure Act after balancing probable distress against probative value; the accused's application for a judge-alone trial is rejected as interests of justice and community involvement favour trial by jury.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Pre Trial Ruling
- Outcome
- pre-trial applications decided; evidence rulings on admissibility; application for judge-alone trial refused
- Legal Topics
- ['historical Sexual Assault' 'tendency Evidence' 'complaint Evidence' 'sexual Experience Evidence' 'trial by Judge Alone' 'admissibility' 'covid 19 Procedural Measures']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Pre Trial Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 ['admissibility of tendency evidence' 'admissibility of complaint evidence' 'admissibility of sexual experience evidence' 'application for trial by judge alone' 'balancing probative value and prejudice']
Ratio Decidendi
Tendency evidence regarding sexual interest in the complainant and young males, with explicit exclusions made for prejudicial aspects, is admissible under ss 97, 97A, and 101 of the Evidence Act as it has significant probative value not outweighed by unfair prejudice; complaint evidence admitted as being fresh in memory; evidence of child prostitution at relevant times is admissible under s 293(4)(b) Criminal Procedure Act after balancing probable distress against probative value; the accused's application for a judge-alone trial is rejected as interests of justice and community involvement favour trial by jury.
Court Disposition
pre-trial applications decided; evidence rulings on admissibility; application for judge-alone trial refused
Orders
- ['Tendency evidence admitted with specified exclusions for prejudicial content.' 'Complaint evidence from witness Gammon admitted.' "Redacted YouTube commentary admitted except emotive last sentence and phrase 'it's not homosexuality when'." "Evidence of complainant's sexual activity at the Wall admitted under s...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment