Wong and Anor v Neue and Neue-Bartocha [2008] NSWLEC 1122
The application to remove the trees and for compensation was refused because the evidence did not establish that the trees had caused or were likely to cause damage to the retaining wall. Other factors, such as inadequate construction, lack of drainage, and soil conditions, were considered more likely causes of the wall's damage.
- Parties
- Applicant: Ho Shing Wong; Applicant: Dason Wong; Respondent: Gunter Neue; Respondent: Helga Neue-Bartocha
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Neighbour Application Trees (neighbours) / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Tree Disputes, Damage to Property, Retaining Walls, Compensation, Neighbour Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ho Shing Wong
Applicant
Dason Wong
Applicant
Gunter Neue
Respondent
Helga Neue-Bartocha
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Neighbour Application Trees (neighbours) / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the roots of the respondents' trees caused damage to the applicants' retaining wall
- 2 Whether the trees should be removed
- 3 Whether compensation should be awarded for the removal and replacement of the retaining wall
Ratio Decidendi
The application to remove the trees and for compensation was refused because the evidence did not establish that the trees had caused or were likely to cause damage to the retaining wall. Other factors, such as inadequate construction, lack of drainage, and soil conditions, were considered more likely causes of the wall's damage.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- The application is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment