Lu v Regina [2008] NSWCCA 261
The sentence imposed for manslaughter was within the appropriate discretionary range considering the seriousness of the offence, Mr Lu's lengthy prior criminal history, poor rehabilitation prospects, and commission of the offence while on conditional liberty. The refusal to partially accumulate the sentence with the earlier drug offence was justified under the principles of totality and did not constitute an error.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Sentencing Appeal; Judgment on Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'manslaughter' 'totality Principle' 'concurrent and Consecutive Sentences' 'aggravation and Mitigation' 'exercise of Sentencing Discretion']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentencing Appeal; Judgment on Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed for manslaughter was manifestly excessive' 'Whether the trial judge erred in refusing to partially accumulate the sentence for manslaughter with an earlier sentence for supply prohibited drug']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed for manslaughter was within the appropriate discretionary range considering the seriousness of the offence, Mr Lu's lengthy prior criminal history, poor rehabilitation prospects, and commission of the offence while on conditional liberty. The refusal to partially accumulate the sentence with the earlier drug offence was justified under the principles of totality and did not constitute an error.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against sentence granted' 'Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment