Home Site Pty Limited v Waverley Council [2009] NSWLEC 1354
Significant determining weight should be given to the draft LEP and DCP as they are at a high level of certainty and imminence, making it appropriate to grant consent despite non-compliance with current controls; the mere possibility of change is insufficient to outweigh this certainty.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved with conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Applications' 'draft Local Environmental Plan' 'development Control Plan' 'certainty and Imminence' 'deferred Commencement Condition']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether consent should be granted to a development which is unacceptable under current planning controls but acceptable under draft planning controls that have not come into effect' 'Whether a deferred commencement condition is necessary to align development consent with the draft controls']
Ratio Decidendi
Significant determining weight should be given to the draft LEP and DCP as they are at a high level of certainty and imminence, making it appropriate to grant consent despite non-compliance with current controls; the mere possibility of change is insufficient to outweigh this certainty.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved with conditions.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development application for the erection of two nine-storey residential flat buildings at 42 - 48 Waverley Street, Bondi Junction is determined by the granting of development consent subject to the conditions in Annexure A.' 'Exhibit D is retained.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment