Huang v Abayawickrama [2008] FCA 1764
Stone J refused leave to appeal because Cameron FM's decision that service on the first respondent was ineffective was undoubtedly correct, the applicant's proposed appeal was incompetent and not directed to that decision, and any appeal from it would be bound to fail.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Federal Court Application for Leave to Appeal From a Decision of Federal Magistrate Cameron Given on 22 October 2008
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs; leave to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Appeal' 'service Outside Australia' 'foreign Service' 'federal Magistrates Court Rules' 'dismissal With Costs']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Federal Court Application for Leave to Appeal From a Decision of Federal Magistrate Cameron Given on 22 October 2008
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether leave should be granted to appeal from Federal Magistrate Cameron's decision of 22 October 2008 concerning ineffective service on the first respondent in Sri Lanka." "Whether the proposed appeal had sufficient merit where the draft notice of appeal was incompetent and the applicant's submissions did not address the decision under challenge."]
Ratio Decidendi
Stone J refused leave to appeal because Cameron FM's decision that service on the first respondent was ineffective was undoubtedly correct, the applicant's proposed appeal was incompetent and not directed to that decision, and any appeal from it would be bound to fail.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs; leave to appeal refused.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment