Zhang v Mercer [2020] NSWLEC 1415
There was no valid evidence of previous or current damage to the applicant's property, nor likelihood of damage or injury in the near future, therefore the requirements of s 7 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 were not satisfied and no orders for intervention with the tree can be made.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Principal Judgment Determination
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['tree Disputes' 'nuisance' 'encroachment' 'damage to Property' 'risk of Injury' 'neighbour Disputes']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Principal Judgment Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the tree has caused, is causing, or is likely in the near future to cause damage to the applicant's property" 'Whether the tree is likely to cause injury to any person' 'Whether debris from the tree constitutes actionable damage under the Act' 'Whether regular or heavy pruning is required under the Act']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no valid evidence of previous or current damage to the applicant's property, nor likelihood of damage or injury in the near future, therefore the requirements of s 7 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 were not satisfied and no orders for intervention with the tree can be made.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment