Horizons (Asia) Pty Ltd v Enagic Co Ltd (Security for Costs) [2022] FCA 365
There is a real risk that the applicant will not be able to pay a costs order if made, particularly given its failure to provide financial information, evidence of minimal assets, outstanding legal fees, a pending winding up application, presumed insolvency, and participation in other disputes. Security for costs is therefore warranted in the amount of $60,000.
- Parties
- Appellant: Horizons (Asia) Pty Ltd; Respondent: Enagic Co Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Security for Costs (pending Leave to Appeal and Appeal) / Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Security for costs ordered against the applicant, with consequences for non-compliance; applicant to pay the respondent’s costs of the application.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Appeals, Trade Marks
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Horizons (Asia) Pty Ltd
Appellant
Enagic Co Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Security for Costs (pending Leave to Appeal and Appeal) / Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether security for costs should be ordered in respect of an application for leave to appeal and appeal
- 2 Appropriate quantum and terms of security for costs
Ratio Decidendi
There is a real risk that the applicant will not be able to pay a costs order if made, particularly given its failure to provide financial information, evidence of minimal assets, outstanding legal fees, a pending winding up application, presumed insolvency, and participation in other disputes. Security for costs is therefore warranted in the amount of $60,000.
Court Disposition
Security for costs ordered against the applicant, with consequences for non-compliance; applicant to pay the respondent’s costs of the application.
Orders
- The applicant provide security for the respondent's costs of the application for leave to appeal and any appeal by payment into court of the sum of $60,000 on or before 5.00pm AEST on Tuesday, 12 April 2022, failing which: (a) the proceeding be ipso facto stayed; (b) the respondent file an application for dismissal...
- The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application for security for costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment