Warringah Council v Koch and Severino [2006] NSWLEC 608
Because the proceedings were instituted before the commencement of the 2006 amendment, s 257D did not apply; under s 253 and the ordinary principle that costs follow the event, and with no opposition or disentitling conduct identified, the successful defendants were entitled to their costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 September 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Class 5 Proceedings / Application for Costs by Successful Defendants
- Outcome
- Costs ordered in favour of the successful defendants.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs in Favour of Successful Defendants' 'limit on Award of Professional Costs Against a Prosecutor Acting in a Public Capacity' 'application of Amendments to Proceedings Instituted Before Commencement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 5 Proceedings / Application for Costs by Successful Defendants
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the successful defendants should receive costs after the charges were dismissed.' 'Whether s 257D of the Courts Legislation Amendment Act 2006 applied to restrict an award of professional costs in these proceedings.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the proceedings were instituted before the commencement of the 2006 amendment, s 257D did not apply; under s 253 and the ordinary principle that costs follow the event, and with no opposition or disentitling conduct identified, the successful defendants were entitled to their costs.
Court Disposition
Costs ordered in favour of the successful defendants.
Orders
- ["In each matter, the prosecutor is to pay the defendant's costs as agreed or assessed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment