Horton Asset Pty Ltd v HMSY Group Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 1619
Plaintiff entitled to default judgment for the loan sum plus interest as the defendant filed no defence, did not contest liability or amount, and made a submission to abide by the court’s orders. Existing freezing order ceases upon determination of proceedings as drafted in prior consent order. Plaintiff entitled to indemnity costs in line with the loan, save for costs relating to the freezing orders, which are to be on an ordinary basis. No extension of the freezing order is permitted absent a formal application.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Horton Asset Pty Ltd; Defendant: HMSY Group Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Recovery—loan/default Judgment/freezing Order / Default Judgment; Dismissal of Notice of Motion; Post Judgment Costs
- Outcome
- Default judgment for plaintiff; defendant's notice of motion dismissed with costs; costs orders as set out.
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Freezing Order, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Horton Asset Pty Ltd
Plaintiff
HMSY Group Pty Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Recovery—loan/default Judgment/freezing Order / Default Judgment; Dismissal of Notice of Motion; Post Judgment Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to default judgment in absence of a defence
- 2 Whether the existing freezing order should be discharged or extended on conclusion of proceedings
- 3 Appropriate costs orders regarding default judgment and freezing order proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff entitled to default judgment for the loan sum plus interest as the defendant filed no defence, did not contest liability or amount, and made a submission to abide by the court’s orders. Existing freezing order ceases upon determination of proceedings as drafted in prior consent order. Plaintiff entitled to indemnity costs in line with the loan, save for costs relating to the freezing orders, which are to be on an ordinary basis. No extension of the freezing order is permitted absent a formal application.
Court Disposition
Default judgment for plaintiff; defendant's notice of motion dismissed with costs; costs orders as set out.
Orders
- Note the defendant’s undertaking not to deal with specified funds prior to 4pm on 17 December 2024.
- Default judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $2,016,642.47.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment