Housing NSW v Hamilton [2015] NSWCATAP 136
The Tribunal lacked power to make the relocation order and associated orders. The relocation order was not an order requiring performance of the residential tenancy agreement under s 187(1)(b), nor an order directing compliance with s 50(3) under s 187(1)(h), because the relevant obligation to take reasonable steps related to Ms Hamilton's use of the existing residential premises the subject of the agreement, not relocation to other premises. Although s 187(1)(d) permits non-monetary compensation, the relocation order went beyond and could not be characterised as compensation for the loss caused by interference with quiet enjoyment. Because there was no primary power to make the...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Concerning NCAT Power to Make Orders Under the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (nsw) / Appeal From Decision of the Consumer and Commercial Division of NCAT Dated 27 February 2015
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; decision under appeal set aside; matter remitted to the Consumer and Commercial Division of NCAT constituted by a different member.
- Legal Topics
- ['scope of NCAT Order Making Powers' 'quiet Enjoyment' 'compensation Under S 187(1)(d) of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (nsw)' 'ancillary Orders Under S 188(c) of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (nsw)' 'remittal to Differently Constituted Tribunal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Concerning NCAT Power to Make Orders Under the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (nsw) / Appeal From Decision of the Consumer and Commercial Division of NCAT Dated 27 February 2015
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether NCAT had power under the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) to order Housing NSW to relocate Ms Hamilton to alternative premises under its control and management.' 'Whether the relocation order could be characterised as an order requiring action in performance of a residential tenancy agreement under s 187(1)(b) of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW).' 'Whether the relocation order could be characterised as an order directing Housing NSW to comply with a requirement of the Act or regulations under s 187(1)(h) of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW).' 'Whether the relocation order could be characterised as an order as to compensation under s 187(1)(d) of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW).' 'Whether the relocation order or associated orders could be made as ancillary orders under s 188(c) of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW).' 'Whether the matter should be remitted to a differently constituted Tribunal.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal lacked power to make the relocation order and associated orders. The relocation order was not an order requiring performance of the residential tenancy agreement under s 187(1)(b), nor an order directing compliance with s 50(3) under s 187(1)(h), because the relevant obligation to take reasonable steps related to Ms Hamilton's use of the existing residential premises the subject of the agreement, not relocation to other premises. Although s 187(1)(d) permits non-monetary compensation, the relocation order went beyond and could not be characterised as compensation for the loss caused by interference with quiet enjoyment. Because there was no primary power to make the...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; decision under appeal set aside; matter remitted to the Consumer and Commercial Division of NCAT constituted by a different member.
Orders
- ['The appeal is allowed.' 'The decision under appeal is set aside.' 'Remit the matter to the Consumer and Commercial Division of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal constituted by a member other than the member who made the original decision, to be determined in accordance with these reasons and otherwise...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment