El-Ali v R [2015] NSWCCA 300

El-Ali v R [2015] NSWCCA 300

The evidence, though not perfect and subject to inconsistencies and delay, was well open to be accepted by the jury as truthful. Tendency evidence was admitted appropriately with adequate judicial directions. There was no error established in admitting tendency evidence, refusing to discharge the jury, or in concluding the presence of Dean Boyd aggravated the offence. The appeal grounds did not warrant intervention.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 December 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Appeal against conviction dismissed; leave to appeal against sentence refused.
Legal Topics
['sexual Intercourse Without Consent' 'aggravation Circumstances' 'appeal Against Conviction' 'tendency Evidence' 'jury Directions' 'appeal Against Sentence' 'presence of Another Person as Aggravation']
['criminal Law'] ['sexual Intercourse Without Consent' 'aggravation Circumstances' 'appeal Against Conviction' 'tendency Evidence' 'jury Directions' 'appeal Against Sentence' 'presence of Another Person as Aggravation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether verdict was unreasonable' 'Whether error in directions to jury concerning tendency evidence' 'Whether error in failure to provide reasons for discharging the jury' 'Whether error in concluding that presence of another person aggravated the offence']

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence, though not perfect and subject to inconsistencies and delay, was well open to be accepted by the jury as truthful. Tendency evidence was admitted appropriately with adequate judicial directions. There was no error established in admitting tendency evidence, refusing to discharge the jury, or in concluding the presence of Dean Boyd aggravated the offence. The appeal grounds did not warrant intervention.

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction dismissed; leave to appeal against sentence refused.

Orders

  • ['Appeal against conviction dismissed.' 'Leave to appeal against sentence refused.']