HPAL Limited [2007] FCA 1570
Orders convening meeting under s 411(1) should be made as statutory and procedural requirements are satisfied, the scheme structure addresses identified risks, and the break fee is appropriate given arm's length negotiations and absence of substantial shareholding by acquirer.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Scheme of Arrangement / First Court Hearing for Order to Convene Meeting of Shareholders
- Outcome
- application for convening meeting granted
- Legal Topics
- ['scheme of Arrangement' 'performance Risk' 'break Fee' 'jurisdictional and Procedural Practice']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Scheme of Arrangement / First Court Hearing for Order to Convene Meeting of Shareholders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether statutory conditions for convening shareholders' meeting under s 411(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) are satisfied" 'Whether the scheme structure addresses performance risk and vests shares free of encumbrances' 'Whether the break fee provision is appropriate']
Ratio Decidendi
Orders convening meeting under s 411(1) should be made as statutory and procedural requirements are satisfied, the scheme structure addresses identified risks, and the break fee is appropriate given arm's length negotiations and absence of substantial shareholding by acquirer.
Court Disposition
application for convening meeting granted
Orders
- ['HPAL to convene meeting of shareholders for considering scheme of arrangement' 'Meeting to be held on 17 October 2007 at Museum of Sydney' 'Chairperson to be Ed Hoppe or Rod Atfield' 'Chairperson can adjourn meeting at discretion' 'Explanatory Memorandum approved for distribution' 'Explanatory Memorandum to be...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment