Zhong v i-Prosperity Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 1059
Paragraph 21 of the amended defence contained a formal, clear and unambiguous admission, made while the second defendant was legally represented, that $2.9 million became due and payable to the plaintiff in around mid-March 2020 and remained unpaid by the defendants. The plural reference to the defendants, the pleading of joint and several liability in the amended statement of claim, and related allegations in the amended defence supported entry of partial judgment against the second defendant. There was no proper discretionary basis to refuse relief under r 17.7.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Procedure Application for Judgment on Admissions / Notice of Motion for Partial Judgment
- Outcome
- Partial judgment entered for the plaintiff against the second defendant in the amount of $2,900,000. Costs of the motion reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['admissions' 'judgment on Admissions' 'partial Judgment' 'uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (nsw) R 17.7']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Procedure Application for Judgment on Admissions / Notice of Motion for Partial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the amended defence contained a clear and unambiguous admission that $2.9 million was due and payable to the plaintiff by the second defendant.' 'Whether the Court should exercise its discretion under r 17.7 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) to enter partial judgment against the second defendant.']
Ratio Decidendi
Paragraph 21 of the amended defence contained a formal, clear and unambiguous admission, made while the second defendant was legally represented, that $2.9 million became due and payable to the plaintiff in around mid-March 2020 and remained unpaid by the defendants. The plural reference to the defendants, the pleading of joint and several liability in the amended statement of claim, and related allegations in the amended defence supported entry of partial judgment against the second defendant. There was no proper discretionary basis to refuse relief under r 17.7.
Court Disposition
Partial judgment entered for the plaintiff against the second defendant in the amount of $2,900,000. Costs of the motion reserved.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to r 17.7 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), partial judgment is given in favour of the plaintiff against the second defendant in the amount of $2,900,000.00.' "The costs of the plaintiff's notice of motion filed 14 July 2020 be reserved, including in respect of the hearing on 5 August 2020."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment