Chiou v Wang [2000] FCA 713
The applicants failed to establish a sufficient evidentiary basis proving risk that the respondent would dissipate proceeds so as to defeat potential bankruptcy relief against the third party, and their case on the ex-husband’s residency for engaging bankruptcy jurisdiction was weak; the balance of convenience did not favour granting Mareva relief against a non-party in these circumstances.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Mareva Injunction / Interlocutory Application; Judgment Refusing Application
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- ['mareva Injunction' 'third Party Relief' 'bankruptcy' 'asset Freezing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Mareva Injunction / Interlocutory Application; Judgment Refusing Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Mareva-type interlocutory relief should be granted restraining respondent from disposing of proceeds pending bankruptcy of a third party' 'Whether there is sufficient risk that proceeds will be put beyond reach of applicants if relief not granted' 'Whether applicants can satisfy test for bankruptcy by establishing third party is ordinarily resident in Australia']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants failed to establish a sufficient evidentiary basis proving risk that the respondent would dissipate proceeds so as to defeat potential bankruptcy relief against the third party, and their case on the ex-husband’s residency for engaging bankruptcy jurisdiction was weak; the balance of convenience did not favour granting Mareva relief against a non-party in these circumstances.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- ['The application be refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment