Chiou v Wang [2000] FCA 713

Chiou v Wang [2000] FCA 713

The applicants failed to establish a sufficient evidentiary basis proving risk that the respondent would dissipate proceeds so as to defeat potential bankruptcy relief against the third party, and their case on the ex-husband’s residency for engaging bankruptcy jurisdiction was weak; the balance of convenience did not favour granting Mareva relief against a non-party in these circumstances.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 May 2000
Procedural Posture
Application for Mareva Injunction / Interlocutory Application; Judgment Refusing Application
Outcome
application refused
Legal Topics
['mareva Injunction' 'third Party Relief' 'bankruptcy' 'asset Freezing']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Mareva Injunction / Interlocutory Application; Judgment Refusing Application

  1. 1 ['Whether Mareva-type interlocutory relief should be granted restraining respondent from disposing of proceeds pending bankruptcy of a third party' 'Whether there is sufficient risk that proceeds will be put beyond reach of applicants if relief not granted' 'Whether applicants can satisfy test for bankruptcy by establishing third party is ordinarily resident in Australia']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicants failed to establish a sufficient evidentiary basis proving risk that the respondent would dissipate proceeds so as to defeat potential bankruptcy relief against the third party, and their case on the ex-husband’s residency for engaging bankruptcy jurisdiction was weak; the balance of convenience did not favour granting Mareva relief against a non-party in these circumstances.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

  • ['The application be refused.']