Hudson Resouces Ltd v Sandner & Anor [1999] NSWSC 1278
The letter was capable of conveying to the ordinary reasonable reader that the plaintiff was in financial difficulties and therefore capable of conveying the insolvency imputation. It was not capable of conveying incompetent management, because financial difficulty may arise for reasons other than incompetent management and nothing else in the letter suggested incompetence. It was not capable of conveying dishonourable conduct or an unfair takeover offer in the ordinary sense, although it could suggest inadequacy of the offer. It was capable, on balance, of conveying that the plaintiff's takeover offer was for the purpose of asset stripping in a condemnatory sense. Accordingly,...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Application Concerning Whether Pleaded Imputations Were Capable of Being Conveyed and Leave to File Amended Statement of Claim
- Outcome
- Leave granted to file amended statement of claim; imputations (b) and (c) struck out; imputations (a) and (d) not struck out; each party to pay his or its own costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['capacity of Defamatory Imputations' 'ordinary Reasonable Reader' 'corporate Insolvency Imputation' 'takeover Offer Communications' 'asset Stripping Imputation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Application Concerning Whether Pleaded Imputations Were Capable of Being Conveyed and Leave to File Amended Statement of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the matter complained of was capable of conveying that the plaintiff is insolvent.' 'Whether the matter complained of was capable of conveying that the plaintiff had so incompetently managed its business as to cause a substantial cash deficiency.' 'Whether the matter complained of was capable of conveying that the plaintiff was a dishonourable company prepared to make an unfair takeover offer for the purpose of remedying its cash deficiencies.' 'Whether the matter complained of was capable of conveying that the plaintiff made a takeover offer for the second defendant for the purpose of stripping the second defendant of its assets including cash.']
Ratio Decidendi
The letter was capable of conveying to the ordinary reasonable reader that the plaintiff was in financial difficulties and therefore capable of conveying the insolvency imputation. It was not capable of conveying incompetent management, because financial difficulty may arise for reasons other than incompetent management and nothing else in the letter suggested incompetence. It was not capable of conveying dishonourable conduct or an unfair takeover offer in the ordinary sense, although it could suggest inadequacy of the offer. It was capable, on balance, of conveying that the plaintiff's takeover offer was for the purpose of asset stripping in a condemnatory sense. Accordingly,...
Court Disposition
Leave granted to file amended statement of claim; imputations (b) and (c) struck out; imputations (a) and (d) not struck out; each party to pay his or its own costs.
Orders
- ['The plaintiff has leave to file an amended statement of claim.' 'Each party pay his or its own costs.' 'The plaintiff is to file any amended Statement of Claim by 17 September.' 'Thereafter the matter can be placed in a Holding List for determination by a jury for the matters relevant for jury determination, and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment