Garth v R [2016] NSWCCA 203
Section 25A(2) of the Crimes Act creates an offence punishable by law independent of section 25B; the mandatory minimum sentence provision does not operate as a penalty-creating provision and is severable. Constitutional questions about s 25B need not be determined as the indictment discloses an offence to which punishment attaches.
- Parties
- Applicant: Hugh Bacalla Garth; First Respondent: Crown; Second Respondent: Attorney-General for New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 September 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From District Court Decision
- Outcome
- leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Assault Causing Death, Mandatory Minimum Sentencing, Constitutionality of Sentencing Provisions, Interpretation of Offence Creating Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hugh Bacalla Garth
Applicant
Crown
First Respondent
Attorney-General for New South Wales
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From District Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 25A(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) creates an offence known to law
- 2 Whether determination of constitutional question regarding s 25B is necessary
- 3 Whether mandatory minimum sentence provision is severable from the offence
Ratio Decidendi
Section 25A(2) of the Crimes Act creates an offence punishable by law independent of section 25B; the mandatory minimum sentence provision does not operate as a penalty-creating provision and is severable. Constitutional questions about s 25B need not be determined as the indictment discloses an offence to which punishment attaches.
Court Disposition
leave to appeal refused
Orders
- Leave to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment