Bond v R [2020] NSWCCA 277
The differentiation between the applicant's sentence and Mr Newport's sentence was justified due to differences in the statutory non-parole period, number and seriousness of offences, Form 1 matters, subjective circumstances, and especially Mr Newport's exceptional rehabilitation. The sentencing judge considered and applied relevant principles, rendering the complaint of unjust disparity unsustainable.
- Parties
- Appellant: Hugh Bond; Respondent: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal (post Sentence)
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Appeal, Supply Commercial Quantity Methylamphetamine, Parity Principle, Standard Non Parole Period, Rehabilitation, Form 1 Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hugh Bond
Appellant
Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal (post Sentence)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a justifiable sense of grievance arises due to disparity between co-offender sentences
- 2 Whether differences between the appellant and co-offender justified differentiated sentences under the parity principle
Ratio Decidendi
The differentiation between the applicant's sentence and Mr Newport's sentence was justified due to differences in the statutory non-parole period, number and seriousness of offences, Form 1 matters, subjective circumstances, and especially Mr Newport's exceptional rehabilitation. The sentencing judge considered and applied relevant principles, rendering the complaint of unjust disparity unsustainable.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted.
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment