Wily, Hugh Jenner v Fitz-Gibbon, Peter Gerald & Anor [1998] FCA 522

Wily, Hugh Jenner v Fitz-Gibbon, Peter Gerald & Anor [1998] FCA 522

The Trustee failed to discharge the onus to prove on the balance of probabilities that the paintings were property of the Bankrupt; evidence established they had been gifted to Mrs Fitz-Gibbon and treated as hers, so they are not property of the Bankrupt under the Bankruptcy Act 1966.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 May 1998
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Judgment on Separate Issue Regarding Ownership of Paintings
Outcome
Application dismissed to the extent it relates to the paintings.
Legal Topics
['property of the Bankrupt' 'gift' 'ownership of Paintings']
['bankruptcy'] ['property of the Bankrupt' 'gift' 'ownership of Paintings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Bankruptcy / Judgment on Separate Issue Regarding Ownership of Paintings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the paintings referred to in the letter dated 17 June 1997 were property of the Bankrupt within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Act 1966']

Ratio Decidendi

The Trustee failed to discharge the onus to prove on the balance of probabilities that the paintings were property of the Bankrupt; evidence established they had been gifted to Mrs Fitz-Gibbon and treated as hers, so they are not property of the Bankrupt under the Bankruptcy Act 1966.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed to the extent it relates to the paintings.

Orders

  • ['None of the paintings referred to in the letter of 17 June 1997 from the Applicant to the First Respondent were property of the Bankrupt as those words are used in the Bankruptcy Act 1966.' 'The application to the extent that it relates to the paintings referred to in the declaration above be dismissed.' "The...