Hugo (a pseudonym) v R [2021] NSWCCA 99
The acquittals on counts 2 and 5-9 necessarily indicate the jury had a doubt about S's credibility; no logical and reasonable explanation for the acquittals other than doubt about S's credibility; it was not open to the jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt of applicant's guilt on count 1 given the unwillingness to convict on other counts relating to S; guilty verdict is unreasonable.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; verdict of acquittal entered.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Conviction' 'unreasonable Verdict' 'credibility and Reliability of Complainant' 'inconsistent Verdicts']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether guilty verdict was unreasonable having regard to inconsistency with acquittals on other counts' "Whether acquittals necessarily indicate doubt about complainant's credibility"]
Ratio Decidendi
The acquittals on counts 2 and 5-9 necessarily indicate the jury had a doubt about S's credibility; no logical and reasonable explanation for the acquittals other than doubt about S's credibility; it was not open to the jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt of applicant's guilt on count 1 given the unwillingness to convict on other counts relating to S; guilty verdict is unreasonable.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; verdict of acquittal entered.
Orders
- ['Grant leave to appeal against conviction.' 'Appeal allowed.' 'Quash the conviction of the appellant on count 1 and set aside the sentence imposed in the District Court on 8 March 2019.' 'Direct a verdict of acquittal be entered on count 1.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment