Lin v Tang [2007] NSWSC 1193

Lin v Tang [2007] NSWSC 1193

The appeal failed because the evidence did not support the plaintiff's contention that she was denied natural justice; rather, it showed she had more than an adequate opportunity to file a defence and present her case, and she had no merits appeal. If leave was required, there was no manifest error, public interest or question of principle to justify it.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 October 2007
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Default Judgment / Summons in the Supreme Court Challenging the Local Court Refusal on 18 May 2007 to Set Aside Default Judgment
Outcome
The Summons is dismissed.
Legal Topics
['default Judgment' 'natural Justice' 'leave to Appeal' 'interlocutory Applications' 'small Claims Division of the Local Court']
['civil Procedure' 'appeals'] ['default Judgment' 'natural Justice' 'leave to Appeal' 'interlocutory Applications' 'small Claims Division of the Local Court']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Default Judgment / Summons in the Supreme Court Challenging the Local Court Refusal on 18 May 2007 to Set Aside Default Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the plaintiff was denied natural justice in the Local Court proceedings.' 'Whether the refusal to set aside the default judgment should be disturbed.' 'Whether, if leave to appeal was required, there was any basis to grant leave.']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal failed because the evidence did not support the plaintiff's contention that she was denied natural justice; rather, it showed she had more than an adequate opportunity to file a defence and present her case, and she had no merits appeal. If leave was required, there was no manifest error, public interest or question of principle to justify it.

Court Disposition

The Summons is dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The Summons is dismissed.' 'The plaintiff is to pay the costs of the Summons.']