Orr v Hunter Quarries Pty Ltd (No. 5) [2021] NSWDC 171
The District Court retains power, before making final orders, to withdraw previously submitted questions in a Stated Case and to refer additional questions to the Court of Criminal Appeal under s 5AE of the Criminal Appeal Act. Questions concerning the proper interpretation and application of 'reasonably practicable' and 'reasonable foreseeability' under the WHS Act constitute questions of law suitable for referral. Accordingly, the original Stated Case questions were withdrawn and new questions directed to be engrossed and submitted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Stated Case Amendment Prior to Final Orders
- Outcome
- Orders made for withdrawal of all questions in the existing Stated Case and for submission of amended Stated Case with new questions of law to the Court of Criminal Appeal.
- Legal Topics
- ['stated Case Procedure' 'question of Law' 'reasonable Foreseeability' 'reasonably Practicable Measures' 'withdrawal and Addition of Questions to Stated Case']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Stated Case Amendment Prior to Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the District Court has power to withdraw questions from a Stated Case already submitted to the Court of Criminal Appeal' 'Whether the District Court has power to refer additional questions after submission of a Stated Case' 'Whether questions in a Stated Case are questions of law within section 5AE of the Criminal Appeal Act' "Interpretation of 'reasonable foreseeability' and 'reasonably practicable' under the Work Health and Safety Act"]
Ratio Decidendi
The District Court retains power, before making final orders, to withdraw previously submitted questions in a Stated Case and to refer additional questions to the Court of Criminal Appeal under s 5AE of the Criminal Appeal Act. Questions concerning the proper interpretation and application of 'reasonably practicable' and 'reasonable foreseeability' under the WHS Act constitute questions of law suitable for referral. Accordingly, the original Stated Case questions were withdrawn and new questions directed to be engrossed and submitted.
Court Disposition
Orders made for withdrawal of all questions in the existing Stated Case and for submission of amended Stated Case with new questions of law to the Court of Criminal Appeal.
Orders
- ['The prosecutor is directed to engross the amended Stated Case in appropriate form for submission to the Court of Criminal Appeal.' 'The prosecutor is directed to provide the amended Stated Case to the Associate by 4.00pm on 20 May 2021.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment