Hunter Valley Skydiving Centre Pty Limited v Central Coast Aero Club Limited & anor [2008] NSWSC 539
By accepting payment of fees due on 21 July 2007, the Club affirmed and waived any prior breaches. Subsequent repeated breaches of operational conditions by HVS constituted breaches of conditions of consent under the agreement, entitling the Club to revoke consent contractually. The Club's exercise of this right was not in breach of any implied obligation of good faith, and relief against forfeiture would not have been granted. The proceedings were dismissed with costs.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Hunter Valley Skydiving Centre Pty Limited; First Defendant: Central Coast Aero Club Limited; Second Defendant: Warnervale Air Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 June 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Contract Proceeding / Final Judgment at Trial
- Outcome
- Proceedings dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Termination of Contract, Waiver of Breaches, Implied Terms, Good Faith, Relief Against Forfeiture, Specific Performance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hunter Valley Skydiving Centre Pty Limited
Plaintiff
Central Coast Aero Club Limited
First Defendant
Warnervale Air Pty Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Contract Proceeding / Final Judgment at Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether breaches by the plaintiff were waived by the defendant prior to 21 July 2007
- 2 Whether further breaches occurred after 21 July 2007 entitling the defendant to revoke consent
- 3 Whether the breaches were of conditions of consent under the agreement
Ratio Decidendi
By accepting payment of fees due on 21 July 2007, the Club affirmed and waived any prior breaches. Subsequent repeated breaches of operational conditions by HVS constituted breaches of conditions of consent under the agreement, entitling the Club to revoke consent contractually. The Club's exercise of this right was not in breach of any implied obligation of good faith, and relief against forfeiture would not have been granted. The proceedings were dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Proceedings dismissed with costs
Orders
- Order that the proceedings be dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment