Hurlstone Park Property Pty Limited v City of Canterbury [2015] NSWLEC 1573
The Commissioner disposed of the proceedings in accordance with the agreement reached between the parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, having been satisfied the decision was one the Court could properly make.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 / Post Conciliation Conference; Final Orders Made After Agreement
- Outcome
- Agreement reached between parties and orders made to give effect to the agreement. Proceedings disposed of pursuant to s 34(3).
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'permissibility' 'height' 'bulk and Scale' 'setbacks' 'amenity Impacts' 'heritage' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 / Post Conciliation Conference; Final Orders Made After Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Development application's permissibility, height, bulk and scale, setbacks, amenity impacts, heritage, amended plans address contentions"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Commissioner disposed of the proceedings in accordance with the agreement reached between the parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, having been satisfied the decision was one the Court could properly make.
Court Disposition
Agreement reached between parties and orders made to give effect to the agreement. Proceedings disposed of pursuant to s 34(3).
Orders
- ['Final orders giving effect to agreement between parties made on 19 February 2016.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
4 paragraphs
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hurlstone Park Property Pty Limited v City of Canterbury [2015] NSWLEC 1573 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 9 October 2015 Date of orders: 19 February 2016 Decision date: 19 February 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Morris C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: permissibility, height, bulk and scale, setbacks, amenity impacts, heritage, amended plans address contentions, conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hurlstone Park Property Pty Limited (Applicant) Canterbury City Council (Respondent) Representation: Ms S. Orbell, Gadens/Mills Oakley Lawyers (Applicant) Mr A. Knox, Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 10562 of 2015 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders. ……………. Commissioner Morris 10562 of 2015 19 February 2016 (72.2 KB, pdf) 10562 of 2015 Morris (C) (237 KB, pdf)
Amendments 23 February 2016 - Year of order DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 23 February 2016