Hurstville City Council v Chang [2011] NSWLEC 1288
The respondent failed to comply with the brothel closure order, all required statutory notifications and considerations under s 121ZS(6) have been satisfied, and there is no lawful residential use for the premises; a utilities order is appropriate and should be made.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 August 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Application Under S 121 ZS of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- ['enforcement of Planning Controls' 'brothel Closure Orders' 'utilities Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Application Under S 121 ZS of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether respondent failed to comply with a brothel closure order under s 121B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979' 'Whether the conditions for making a utilities order under s 121ZS of the Act are satisfied']
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent failed to comply with the brothel closure order, all required statutory notifications and considerations under s 121ZS(6) have been satisfied, and there is no lawful residential use for the premises; a utilities order is appropriate and should be made.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- ['A provider of water or electricity to the subject premises must cease to provide those services for three months from 9 September 2011.' 'Service of the order on the provider of utility services shall be effected by sending a copy by email and registered post by 31 August 2011.' 'Exhibits are returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment