R v Hussein [2021] NSWDC 835
Sentencing for drug supply and related offences committed within three months of release on parole must reflect the seriousness of both the substantive offences and the aggravation of committing them while on parole. While subjective circumstances and reduced general deterrence are considered under Bugmy and Fernando, personal deterrence remains significant due to rapid re-offending. An aggregate sentence is imposed, backdated to midway through revoked parole, with forfeiture of cash and a Samsung phone as proceeds of crime.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Defendant: Hussein, Ahmed
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Drug Offences, Sentencing, Supply Prohibited Drug, Police Pursuit, Property Proceeds of Crime, Break and Enter, Parole Revocation, Aggregate Sentencing, Subjective Circumstances
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Hussein, Ahmed
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for drug supply and related offences committed while on parole?
- 2 How should subjective circumstances (background, trauma, mental health) affect sentencing?
- 3 How does offending while on parole aggravate culpability and sentencing?
Ratio Decidendi
Sentencing for drug supply and related offences committed within three months of release on parole must reflect the seriousness of both the substantive offences and the aggravation of committing them while on parole. While subjective circumstances and reduced general deterrence are considered under Bugmy and Fernando, personal deterrence remains significant due to rapid re-offending. An aggregate sentence is imposed, backdated to midway through revoked parole, with forfeiture of cash and a Samsung phone as proceeds of crime.
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- Aggregate sentence of 5 years and 6 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 4 years (commencing on 12.6.2020, expiring 11.6.2024), balance of term 1 year and 6 months (expiring 11.12.2025)
- Indicative sentences: SEQ 1 + FORM 1 (SEQ 18) - 3 years; SEQ 2 - 6 months; SEQ 8 - 18 months; SEQ 15 - 18 months; SEQ 23 - 9 months; SEQ 5 - 1 year; SEQ 13 - 1 year; SEQ 19 - 6 months; SEQ 22 - 6 months
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment