Huynh v R [2008] NSWCCA 216
No error was demonstrated in the sentencing approach; the court found that the sentencing judge appropriately considered principles of concurrency, accumulation, and totality, and imposed a sentence within the proper range. Even if error with respect to 'special circumstances' was established, no lesser sentence would be warranted given the seriousness and circumstances of the offences.
- Parties
- Applicant: Huy Bao Huynh; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 September 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Proceeds of Crime, Supply of Prohibited Drug, Special Circumstances, Totality Principle
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Huy Bao Huynh
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sentencing judge erred by not reflecting finding of special circumstances in all sentences
- 2 Whether total sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
- 3 Proper application of concurrency, accumulation and totality principles in sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
No error was demonstrated in the sentencing approach; the court found that the sentencing judge appropriately considered principles of concurrency, accumulation, and totality, and imposed a sentence within the proper range. Even if error with respect to 'special circumstances' was established, no lesser sentence would be warranted given the seriousness and circumstances of the offences.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Leave to appeal against sentence is granted.
- Appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment