Hylton Arnold John v Mid-Western Regional Council [2018] NSWLEC 1021
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with that agreement by upholding the appeal and granting consent to the modification application subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Appeal / Orders Following Conciliation Conference on 19 January 2018
- Outcome
- The appeal is upheld and consent is granted to modification application MA0030/2017 subject to the conditions attached at Annexure A.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent Modification' 'road Upgrade Conditions' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 's 34(3) Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Appeal / Orders Following Conciliation Conference on 19 January 2018
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court should give effect to the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to modify conditions of the development consent relating to works in White Rock Road, Pinnacle Swamp."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with that agreement by upholding the appeal and granting consent to the modification application subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
Court Disposition
The appeal is upheld and consent is granted to modification application MA0030/2017 subject to the conditions attached at Annexure A.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Consent is granted to modification application MA0030/2017, subject to the conditions attached at Annexure A, which are marked up to show the changes made by the modification application to the conditions of the development consent granted by the Court in proceedings 11269 of 2007.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment