Aird v Frost & anor [2007] NSWLEC 707
Consent orders for pruning of specified branches granted based on risk of injury, with formal orders reflecting the parties' agreement and the absence of special circumstances to justify complete removal.
- Parties
- Applicant: I Aird; Respondent: S & M Frost
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Neighbour Dispute – Trees / Ex Tempore Judgment, Final Orders by Consent
- Outcome
- Consent orders – pruning of branches granted
- Legal Topics
- Trees (neighbours), Consent Orders, Pruning
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
I Aird
Applicant
S & M Frost
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Neighbour Dispute – Trees / Ex Tempore Judgment, Final Orders by Consent
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dropping of nuts and bark from a Brush Box tree justifies removal or intervention under the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
- 2 Whether the agreed pruning of four overhanging branches is appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
Consent orders for pruning of specified branches granted based on risk of injury, with formal orders reflecting the parties' agreement and the absence of special circumstances to justify complete removal.
Court Disposition
Consent orders – pruning of branches granted
Orders
- The respondent is to prune the four branches of the Brush Box tree (Lophostemon confertus) marked in Annexure A to these orders;
- The pruning is to be undertaken by an arborist of at least AQF level 3 qualifications with appropriate insurances;
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment