IA v TA (No 3) [2017] NSWCA 178

IA v TA (No 3) [2017] NSWCA 178

There was no arguable error or substantial injustice in the making of the interlocutory orders, nor any question of principle warranting appellate intervention; thus, leave to appeal should be refused.

Parties
Applicant: IA; Respondent: TA
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 July 2017
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal Interlocutory Orders
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Interlocutory Orders, Case Management, Protective List
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Interlocutory Orders Case Management Protective List

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

IA

Applicant

TA

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal Interlocutory Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted from interlocutory orders made in case management of remitted proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

There was no arguable error or substantial injustice in the making of the interlocutory orders, nor any question of principle warranting appellate intervention; thus, leave to appeal should be refused.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Applicant's summons is dismissed with costs.