Boyd v Thorn [2016] NSWSC 837

The proceedings were summarily dismissed because the amended statement of claim failed to plead material facts or any newly discovered material to justify setting aside earlier orders for fraud; amounted to an attempt to re-litigate previously determined matters; and the plaintiff lacked standing to challenge the grant of probate.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 14 June 2016
Procedural Posture: Civil—equity / Summary Disposal—application to Strike Out/amended Statement of Claim and to Summarily Dismiss Proceedings
Outcome: Proceedings dismissed
Legal Topics: ['strike Out Application' 'summary Dismissal' 'fraud on the Court' 'standing—challenge to Probate' 'pleadings Requirements']

['practice and Procedure' 'equity'] ['strike Out Application' 'summary Dismissal' 'fraud on the Court' 'standing—challenge to Probate' 'pleadings Requirements']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Civil—equity / Summary Disposal—application to Strike Out/amended Statement of Claim and to Summarily Dismiss Proceedings

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the amended statement of claim should be struck out or the proceedings summarily dismissed under UCPR r 14.28 and r 13.4' 'Whether the plaintiff pleaded material facts to justify setting aside earlier orders for fraud' 'Whether the plaintiff has standing to challenge the grant of probate']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Proceedings dismissed

Orders

['Proceedings dismissed' "Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings"]