Ian Bruce Moore v A-Mac Alarms Pty Limited & Anor [2005] NSWIRComm 217

Ian Bruce Moore v A-Mac Alarms Pty Limited & Anor [2005] NSWIRComm 217

The applicant demonstrated no reason or basis warranting the exercise of discretion to grant a stay. His stated complaints were matters going to the merits of the appeal, there was no evidence that refusal of a stay would render any successful appeal nugatory, there was nothing on the face of the first instance decision founding the contentions raised, and leave to appeal was required.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 June 2005
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal Against a Decision of the Chief Industrial Magistrate; Application for Stay of the Chief Industrial Magistrate's Orders Pending Leave to Appeal and Appeal / Stay Application Pending Determination of Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal
Outcome
Application for stay refused; costs reserved.
Legal Topics
['stay Pending Appeal' 'leave to Appeal' 'recovery of Moneys Under Section 365 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996' 'electrical Contracting Industry (state) Award Entitlements' 'wages, Allowances, Overtime and Leave Entitlements']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal Against a Decision of the Chief Industrial Magistrate; Application for Stay of the Chief Industrial Magistrate's Orders Pending Leave to Appeal and Appeal / Stay Application Pending Determination of Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal

  1. 1 ["Whether the Chief Industrial Magistrate's orders should be stayed pending the application for leave to appeal and appeal." 'Whether the applicant demonstrated an adequate reason or proper basis for a stay that would be fair to all parties.' "Whether the applicant's complaints went to the merits of the proposed appeal rather than to the grant of a stay."]

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant demonstrated no reason or basis warranting the exercise of discretion to grant a stay. His stated complaints were matters going to the merits of the appeal, there was no evidence that refusal of a stay would render any successful appeal nugatory, there was nothing on the face of the first instance decision founding the contentions raised, and leave to appeal was required.

Court Disposition

Application for stay refused; costs reserved.

Orders

  • ["The applicant's application to stay the proceedings is refused." 'The question of costs of the stay application is reserved.']