Morwood v Dalgleish & Anor [2007] NSWSC 32
The plaintiff was living in a de facto relationship with the deceased at the date of death and was eligible for provision under the Family Provision Act 1982. Given the plaintiff’s limited assets and difficult circumstances, and the relatively short relationship, a legacy of $100,000 was held to be appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Family Provision Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Provision made for plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- ['family Provision Act 1982' 'de Facto Relationships' 'provision for Maintenance' 'domestic Relationship']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Was the plaintiff living in a de facto relationship with the deceased at the time of death?' 'Is the plaintiff eligible for provision under the Family Provision Act 1982?' 'What is the appropriate provision for the plaintiff from the estate?']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff was living in a de facto relationship with the deceased at the date of death and was eligible for provision under the Family Provision Act 1982. Given the plaintiff’s limited assets and difficult circumstances, and the relatively short relationship, a legacy of $100,000 was held to be appropriate.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Provision made for plaintiff.
Orders
- ['The plaintiff to receive a legacy out of the estate of the deceased in the sum of $100,000.' "The plaintiff's costs on the ordinary basis and defendants' costs on indemnity basis be paid or retained out of the estate of the deceased." 'Interest payable at the rate provided for under the Wills Probate and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment